I always eat when it’s a struggle not to so it’s probably the same for me but whenever (extremely rarely) I did EF, I obviously had no serious struggle. Sometimes my body is cooperative but I need much more carbs for that.
But I noticed that I can just wait for a soft little hunger to pass, quite often. If I don’t eat at the usual time at 3pm because I am not at home or if I get hungry very early and very subtly but ignore it, an hour later I am usually fine. It never gives me EF but still a handy thing to have.
I used to get more and more hungry while fasting before but it’s good I don’t have that anymore. I suppose my fat adaptation had a hand in it and my lower than before carb intake as well.
If I am not hungry (or get easy satiation), OMAD is impossible. I need big hunger for that size of meal. But there are so many factors, I wondered about it today… That appetite (that some people use for hunger but I looked it up, it’s the desire) is often used for the amount of food to satiate us. “Big appetite” = eating a lot. But why? Appetite is the desire. I may desire food, I even may have a very strong, insistent hunger but still may get satiated by a few bites… I know my signs are unusually uncorrelated but if appetite is the desire, it doesn’t mean one need a big meal…
Today I had a small meal, sadly. Well not sadly if I can pull of a small OMAD lunch I virtually never can…
(I have no idea how much I ate as I haven’t tracked yet but it seemed small…? Less than 600g meat for sure, I did look at my numbers, not very much dairy or eggs either…)
But it’s over 6pm and I am very satiated. Maybe I can avoid eating late. I don’t worry about it, happens what happens. I don’t really have control over it. You don’t say no to my hungry and upset body