Hi Luci,
As you admit that your “are not qualified to interpret studies” how exactly are you somehow magically qualified to pick which experts are right and which ones are wrong? It is a fact, an objective reality, that there are “experts”, dietary scientists, that disagree with the standard dietary recommendations of the AHA. It is an objective fact that the Swedish government has now officially rejected exactly that low fat dogma after an extensive two year review of 16,000 studies.
Please tell me how you are so certain that I am wrong now and that I was not wrong a meager six months ago when my views where, to a very great extent, the same as yours?
Respectfully, I would posit that if your are not qualified to interpret studies, neither are you qualified to opine on which interpretations of those same studies are correct, and which are in error. Anyone who accepts as a truth that you are not qualified to interpret those studies must, as a mater of logic, also dismiss your views on which interpretations of those studies are worth accepting.
Once again, I am not telling you what to think, I am only empowering you to think, to think for yourself.
Just as Socrates is reported to have stated at his trail for impiety, “… the unexamined life is not worth living”, I would assert that the unexamined diet is not worth eating.
Keto for Life.
Warmest Regards,
Richard