Are you allowed to chew gum to help with the production of saliva and prevent dry mouth
Dry Fasting. Is there any science to this?
@gruia, I have a lot of potassium in my diet from leafy greens and avocados. I have a congenital heart defect and take medication to stave of (prevent completely I hope) open-heart surgery. This medication actually causes potassium retention, so I have to watch my intake. It probably would not be wise to be incredibly dehydrated either because of that. I am not so worried about 18 hours of water fasting. I am not sure I know of anybody who does 90h water fasts. I havenât seen limits of safety recommendations.
This is where interpretation comes in, right? The general consensus is that you cannot chew gum, eat salt, etc. You should only be putting water in mouth for necessary things, such as the cleansing ritual for prayer, but in that water is not even swallowed. Many feel that it is ok to brush teeth, though, during the fastâas long as you donât swallow the water. This is based on historical practices of using a miswak to clean teeth (a twig used for cleaning teeth) and on spitting out the water used for cleansing prior to prayers. Others would say to generally avoid brushing teeth though to be sure.
I donât know if this is off limits for a dry fast, but try sucking on a rock of pink sea salt. Itâs something I do when I donât have access to electrolyte water, and other people here have used it to get them through fasting periods.
Just make sure to keep posting. If we donât hear from you again, I doubt anyone else is going to try it.
Are you saying you think you could dry fast 2-3 more days after a 5 day dry fast? Because I think you would die. When they eliminate fluids to end someoneâs life in the hospital the doctor told me it takes 3-5 days. He explained that the person does not experience thirst as the brain switches off the drive for thirst. If I were you I would tread cautiously here, Iâd research the effect of 7days dry fastingon your heart. And not what some guy on the internet says, actual clinical findings from people who survived 7 days.
I think the big problem with dry fasting is that it has so many limitations and issues that it is not worth it compared to a non-dry fast (if weight loss is your only goal).
- You canât easily decide on a length of time. A non-dry fast lets you target a 10 day fast and that is virtually always attainable (i.e. youâd probably only have to stop if you felt ill). But, a dry fast is a different story â if you are staying in a somewhat humid cool room and pretty much still all the time â you can probably dry fast for quite a while. If you live in an arid region and have to go to your office, shopping etc. to the tune of 7,000 steps a day â you would really probably have to stick with a shorter dry fast.
- If you want to do a longer dry fast â you probably shouldnât exercise beyond slow walking. Hitting the gym and sweating the first afternoon of a multi-day dry fast wouldnât make much sense. Not hitting the gym might be impacting your social life and may lead to light depression (if you believe that exercise generally helps mood).
- You probably need to be monitored. Someone that has done several 5 to 10 day non-dry fasts could probably safely continue to do more of them â the physical side has been proven and the mental side wonât have issues (in fact mood usually improves). I think most people would want monitoring for all of their multi-day dry fasts.
With these (and I am sure there are more) kinds of issues â even if dry fasting was shown scientifically to be a more âpowerfulâ form of fasting â I do not think it could be as effective overall. You can simply and safely do many more days of non-dry fasting (while continuing to exercise) than dry fasting.
Really?
I Dry fast almost every day, OMAD, OM2D and sometimes OM3D and find it easy, enjoyable and very comfortable but I am cautious while performing it just as I would be if water fasting
If you are getting good results at your age and doing it daily - great. I was speaking more to the responses about doing several days in a row without water. I just think that any gains won that way will not be as good as gains won by doing non-dry fasting for a much longer time.
Each day of dry fasting is equivalent to 3 days water therefor no need to for a âmuch longer timeâ
The guy in the first video linked above said that dry fasting is 3 times more effective than water fasting âas far as autophagy is concerned and as far as overall cleansing of the cells is concernedâ. But, the âclick baitâ type text outside of the video mentions burning 3 times the fat.
Thatâs the part I am not too sure about. If I do a non-dry fast and burn about 3,5000 calories in a day (about a pound of fat) then if I simply dry fast instead, my body would burn 10,500 calories of fat in a day - seems questionable. It seems - from all of the other things he said that, if you were really careful, a dry fast might have some real benefits. But he also says you shouldnât remain dehydrated all of the time. If I were going to try this, I think I would do it once every 3 or 4 months at most so that there would actually be some things around to be cleaned out. It seems like doing it too often would mean youâd run out of the junk cells that need to go - and then I donât know what would happen.
Any scientific evidence to this âburn fat 3x fasterâ thing? There is none Iâm aware of.
Iâd be curious too, but Iâm also more inclined to believe it because I canât think of anyone that benefits from selling the idea. At least bottled water companies could TRY to make a buck pushing water fasts. I canât think of anyone that makes a buck from a dry fast.
The âDry Fasting: Burn Fat 3x Faster (Use Extreme Caution)â video has had over a half a million views. Heâs making money from it (following the âI have a secret - watch and I will tell youâ approach - then saying, âentertainment onlyâ, medical supervision required etc.). Even if it is difficult to determine who is (and how they are) making money from something - I would not use that as a criteria to believe something (but the opposite is definitely true - I would have difficulty believing some big-sugar-paid-off scientists claiming soft drinks are okay).
See, I feel like I missed the boat on that. Iâm either too old or just not tech savvy enough. I donât understand how people make money on free videos.
Iâve looked around a bit just now and cannot find it. I would actually love to find it! Mostly what I see is that a pound of fat a day is pretty much the limit. I think Richard Morris has talked about this and about some maximum fat loss capacity. It had to do with how much fat was on the person. Basically a 110 pound 5 foot female isnât going to be able to drop nearly as much as a 240 pound 6 foot male. But, if anyone found a method to triple that loss - I think it would be on the front page of a lot of newspapers.
Advertising - if you use YouTube you fall into 1 of 2 categories:
Either you watch for free and receive advertising - which the advertisers are paying for and the content person gets their part
OR
You buy âYouTube Redâ and pay a monthly fee to go directly to videos without advertising (which I do and it is a great experience!) - again, the content providers get their part of your monthly fee.
YouTube is very dependent on the content providers to help bring in both kinds of revenue. Content providers are dependent on you watching their videos to make money (the number of views determines how much they get).
That may not be a perfect explanation because I am not a content provider - it is just my understanding up to this point.
I think you misunderstand
Faster does not equal more
If I run a mile 3 times faster Iâm still only running a mile
That said Dry fasting can burn more fat because fat is needed for both water and fuel
Dry Fasting is more stressful and deeper and a powerful form of fasting and should be approached with great care its not for the weak or uninitiated