Well… being that the term ‘anti-vaxxer’ is in fact used as a slur and/or to obstruct discourse on informed consent (not saying you’re doing that, just pointing to the where it came from) actually makes me more interested in any smart person labeled that 
Sidenote - Few people in today’s digital media culture seem to know that there is diversity in vaccine dissent.
Apart from various & sundry fundamentalists, new agers, and vegan parents - inoculation critics are also well-educated scholars, midwives, nurses, and independent physicians who are specifically addressing worthy issues like combined vaccines vs. single dose (MMR vs. separate shots for measles, mumps, and rubella over time) as well as profit-driven excessive boosters.
They are also addressing the fact that average young children now receive some 70 doses compared to former decades of just 12 or so - starting as newborns (which I find appallingly unethical). It’s the combined vaccines side effects subject that the CDC itself has documented and fraudulently covered up - and for which Dr. William Thompson, senior scientist at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and whistleblower on that fraud was put under Federal protection. In Australia, much work has been done by midwives to expose the Gardasil vaccine’s risks for young women & girls, including the death rates.
The antithesis of the very trope “anti-vaxxer” is well displayed in the people featured in Robert DeNiro’s Tribeca Films documentary “Vaxxed” on these particular issues and the CDC expose story. I saw it at a private screening at a theatre, and found it to be really well done in its artful yet measured exploration of nuanced issues and diverse people. Due to a campaign against the film - a social contagion which originated from high places in industry & government - it got pulled from the U.S. Tribeca film festival, for which De Niro later expressed great regret.
The global pharmaceuticals industry is the largest industry on earth - outpacing oil, gas, and petrochemicals combined. This is an astonishing fact and huge scam that should inspire us to question it. Lots of financial incentives behind it. And the stifling of well-measured scholarly dissent and independent research in a post-postmodernist corporatized medicine is ‘de rigueur’ these days - just look at what happened to Dr. Tim Noakes, Dr. Gary Fettkes related to dietary guidelines, etc etc
I’m a huge fan of everybody questioning industrial “medicine” and “food”. And also of social change to ensure that all children are well-nourished from before birth (which means valuing female access to education, health, and safety) for informed choice on a range of topics. I’ve long advocated being conservative with vaccines and liberal with informed choice education on a range of small print on ingredients and side effects, as well as on primal nutrition - successful paleo/mammalian breastfeeding rates (meaning, exclusive for at least the first 6 months and then continuing for at least a year or - four, the worldwide average and relatively rare in high tech westernized cultures) has enormous benefits for both mother and child’s immunological, hormonal, and neurological health that can’t be replicated by any lab. Babies & children have stone-age nervous systems, and immunity in an industrial culture is a vast subject that deserves way more than reductionism.
Dr. Berg on the other hand - well, I don’t follow him or what he’s said on the subject.
