And yet these Inuit were not in ketosis, due to a gene variant. Not representative for us.
It’s possible that older civilizations ate less carbs. I’d like to see studies on that before I can comment on that. According to the study I cited (you’ll find the full text on academia), only tundra populations ate ketogenic (3-9 percent carbs). “Northern forest” was 10-15%. Also populations would tend to have been larger in more temperate areas, I’m on thin ice there but I think humankind evolved mainly in Africa, didn’t it? So a dip in temperature could have been offset by a population distribution centered on equatorial areas. Not too many primates up in the north, back then.
However, that’s all speculation. What’s not speculation is that the paleopathologic research say that these studied hunter-and-gatherer civilizations were healthy, despite eating up to 35% carbs. So there is no indication at all that eating some carbs (seasonal, unprocessed, without seed/grain oils) would lead to diseases of civilization. And ketogenic individuals or communities that were healthy do not contradict this in any way. But seems the number of truly ketogenic communities are preciously low in any case. The Inuit are out, the Masai are out (drank a lot of milk IIRC), and then what?.
While there is clear evidence that other civilizations (like the egyptians), eating like they worshipped Ornish books, were diabetic and fat at 30 and dead at 40. So yes, paleopathology can and will tell us if a civilization developed metabolic syndrome and all that comes with it. Mike Eades recently did a new talk on this (available on youtube).
This discussion may not make a difference for me personally, prediabetic after 40+ years of high-carb, low-fat, high-omega 6 diet. Chances are my metabolism will never fully recover, and I may have to eat keto or nearly keto for the rest of my life. But may make a difference to people that are metabolically healthy.
I don’t see any scientific reason why metabolically healthy people shouldn’t eat up to 100g unprocessed carbs a day, unless there are studies that I’ve missed. And I don’t know of any evidence that up to 100g carbs is worse or better than ketogenic diet for people without insulin resistance. Sounds perfectly reasonable to try “some carbs” if you run into trouble on keto.