Hi all.
I’ve started a low-carb, fat replacement diet about 4 weeks ago.
I have no idea whether I have reached ketosis - I have had pretty much none of the symptoms, apart from a general feeling of not being hungry, which is great.
I have been skipping breakfast every day (no cheating). I have had none of the big carbs - beer, rice, pasta, bread, sugar, etc.
From my home scales my starting numbers were:
99.3 kg weight
33.2 BMI
36.3 Fat %
29.6 Muscle %
17 (no idea what scale) visceral fat
1989 resting calorific burn.
I’m 46, male, 5-9 or 174cm height, and I would have thought I was pretty much in the risk category when it comes to pre-diabetes.
I went to the doctor a day or so before the start to discuss my plan to try keto. I was told that her, and the UK National Health Service’s remit was not to provide this sort of advice.
I asked, what, not to provide advice on weight loss? She said that she could provide advice on weight loss, but not specific diets. (I suspect she had no idea what I was talking about.)
I asked for her advice on weight loss. She said (and I’m not abbreviating) “Monitor intake, monitor output, do more exercise.”
Hmm.
I complained via letter to the practice head and made an appointment to see him. He was a lot more understanding. He said that if I was to undertake a period of weight loss then it was always good to take some blood tests before and after, to monitor how things are working. So we did this. (He also went on about calories though… clearly no better informed, but at least looking at the numbers.)
Now about 4 weeks on I have the following numbers from my scale:
93.6kg
31.3 BMI
35.6 Body fat %
29.7 Muscle %
15 Visceral fat
1907 resting cals
And my blood tests are back. Blood was taken about 3 weeks into the change of eating.
Interesting ones are:
HbA1c: IFCC standardised is 35, which is 5.4 DCCT%
I think this means I am not showing signs of being pre-diabetic?
Liver ALT level 115 iu/L
It says I’m high on this
Gamma GT level 90 - again, high
Ferritin 531 ug/L - again high.
Apparently according to the NHS these three show signs of some sort of liver problem?
Cholesterol 6.2 mmol/L
HDL cholesterol 1.21 mmol/L
LDL 4.49 mmol/L
Cholesterol:HDL ratio 5.1
Non-HDL cholesterol 5 mmol/L
This is a dangerous level according to the results.
Can anyone shed any light on the above? Which, if any, are likely to change if I keep this eating up? Should I be alarmed regarding the liver results?
The second doctor is going to do another blood test just before the end of December, so I will have some numbers to compare soon.
Thanks for your help and inspiration.
Jake.