Ok… some interesting observations comparing last year to this year!
I didn’t capture fat and muscle separately last year so all I have is fat vs. non-fat. Still, it is useful I think.
So I started at a lower weight and fat level and lost at a slightly higher rate (both fat and non-fat).
But here’s the interesting part… I plotted the data on two different scales so the lines can start at the same point. The scales are the same though so the lines are still comparable…
First, I notice that the non-fat loss this year is lower. This may be due to starting at a higher fat content to begin with? It may also be a function of lower stress (much happier this year)? Or it could just be adaptation since this is now my third fast over 10 days…
Second, the fat loss rate is comparable even though I’ve been feeling a lot more discomfort. I expected better but I guess this is consistent…
Third (and most important) is that both fat and non-fat loss rate reduced significantly after two weeks (right about this point). My suspicion is that my metabolic rate shifted down to minimize the loss right around then. I do remember feeling a lot more lethargic and tired on my third week… eventually getting to the point where I stopped at 19 days.
This may have also been a matter of hitting a particular fat level, not the duration of the fast. It happened around 34lbs of fat or 20% bf. I’m currently at 40lbs (22.4%) so I probably have another 6lbs of fat in me before I hit that wall again.
Curiously, the scale actually indicated a fat mass INCREASE for the first time in that fast which can only be the result of increased water retention. This lasted for three days before it finally gave up and purged the fluid. I wonder what would have happened if I had continued for another week…
To those so inclined - take a look at the results and let me know what you see!