Ack! I should have checked your profile, Mark.
Dr Berg or Dr Berry?
No worries sir⦠we are all only humanā¦even when keto superpeopleā¦
I was always hit with āThe Blue Zonesā on MFP as proof that carbs are good. I havenāt done much to research blue zones but aside from genetic and environmental possible relationships nobody seem to look at what kind of carbs they eat. I doubt that a 100 year old blue zoner has been eating highly processed carbs out of a box their whole life.
I find the Loma Linda blue zone a little deceptive. Itās an SDA Mecca. All the āhealthy typeā SDAs flock there while not so healthy SDAs are going to wellness clinics spending ridiculous amounts of their savings trying unsuccessfully to get healthy. The less than healthy SDAs canāt afford to live there.
Any place can be a blue zone when the healthiest segment of a population is drawn together in one place.
I donāt know about the other blue zones but Iām skeptical about reading more into them than is there.
Find the link to the following quotes, et⦠following the quotes
Consensus Is Not Science
The late Michael Crichton, MD, author, film producer, put it this way:
āI want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because youāre being had.
āLetās be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.
āThere is no such thing as consensus science. If itās consensus, it isnāt science. If itās science, it isnāt consensus. Period.
āIn addition, let me remind you that the track record of the consensus is nothing to be proud ofā
(From a talk at the California Institute of Technology on January 17, 2003, printed in Three Speeches by Michael Crichton, SPPI Commentary & Essay Series, 2009.)
Max Planck, one of the fathers, with Albert Einstein, of modern physics, put it this way:
āNew scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.ā
(Address on the 25th anniversary of the Kaiser-Wilhelm Gesellschaft, January 1936, as quoted in Surviving the Swastika: Scientific Research in Nazi Germany, 1993).
Good post, Bob. I didnāt always agree with what Michael Crichton said, but Iām with him, here. He had a great mind and I frigginā love his books.
They are articulate, intelligent and seem to know there stuff with science to back it all up.
Berg is a chiropractor so, by training, heās a fraud and snake oil salesman. Dr. Berry is a real doctor (M.D.) who undertook his own study to figure out the shortcomings in medical nutrition education. He wrote a book, but everything else he does, he does for free to help people. Berry is the real deal. Berg is a fraud and wrong in significant areas.
Wanna elaborate on this one? Chiropractors are the only reason Iām walking and not in pain. 3 different ārealā Doctors told me the only way that was going to happen was pretty invasive back surgery. Donāt pass your biased opinions off as fact, you obviously have no real life experience with the subject.
Nothing against Chiropractors adjusting the body but when it starts getting touted as the cure for various diseases my radar clicks on. My wife goes to one weekly.
IMO Dr. Berg is an out and out fraud and snake oil salesman. Stay away from anyone who is selling anything. Buy a $15 food scale, get the free version of myfitnesspal and keep net carbs under 20 grams. I did those 3 things and lost 100 pounds in 12 months without spending a penny other than the food scale. If you want to know how it works, watch free videos on YouTube like Dr. Berry, Dr. Bikeman, Dr. Phinney, etc. All the rest is a racket. And, whatever you do, stay away from Bulletproof brand. You can buy everything they sell for half what they charge. But, you really donāt need to buy anything but eggs, meat, cheese, broccoli, asparagus, butter and heavy cream.
Neither for my own and varied reasons. Choose who you follow very, very carefully- eyes wide open
Edited to add: Canāt go wrong with Dr. Westman or Dr. Naiman . Check out what they have, take what works and move on. Best wishes
Iāve been catching up on Thomas Delauer recently and, just as a point of interest, have just subscribed to You Tube premium so I can listen with the screen turned off - itās more like podcasts now which suits me better as Iām interested in learning not looking at guys posing
I keep clicking āNot Interestedā when prompted with the offer⦠But being able to just listen and not watch some of the unnecessary extras does have appeal. I might have to give it a try. Thanks for pointing that out.
I donāt trust Dr. Berg for the simple reason that I donāt trust ādoctorsā who are anti-vaccination. I go further than that and think Dr. Berg has done more potential damage to potential Keto newbies than any other YouTube celebrity. Canāt tell how many people Iāve seen of the FB forums trying to shovel down 7-10 cups of veggies down and wondering why they donāt feel well. To say nothing of the fact that heās killing babies and people with compromised immune systems with his anti-vax stance.
And heās actually only a chiro, not a real ādoctorā anyway, yeah.