I have a link to a fantastic video highlighting two whistleblowers that we should all try to share to help wake people up about our diets, the food supply in America, and pharmaceuticals, but the journalist is hated by 30-50% of the country. What do I do?? It’s too good of an interview to pass on and hope another just like it comes along soon with someone everyone likes. That will never happen in our current political environment, especially because most journalists are too scared (as I explain at the end of this post.) How long have we waited for one like this one? Too long. It’s the kind of interview that can actually reach people who don’t yet understand everything we already do, and we all know people we wish knew what we do. So I took a risk, posted it, and hope you all will not let those in power win again by ignoring it just because of one guy. He doesn’t promote his own personal views during the video, and he is learning much of this stuff himself for the very first time during the interview. (A good example is given nearer the end of this post.)
I wasn’t sharing it to woo or convince the regulars, I’m sharing it for two reasons: 1) for new members new to Keto and just starting to learn what really is going on, it’s a great introduction to everything they need to understand, and 2) so that the rest of us have a new tool in our toolbox.
I think it’s really important to stop and think about how big pharma, the food industry, and all these compromised agencies and institutions go about keeping people from knowing the truth, from knowing what was shared in this video. Because they have. Stick with me, I know this is long but these are important points to make.
The more people who know and understand the less money they stand to make; their over-the-top paydays, careers, and positions quickly come to an end. So one of the most common and easy/efficient ways to control the narrative and keep the money flowing is to keep us busy fighting amongst ourselves, unwilling to listen to each other. We won’t have energy left to look more closely at them. They manufacture discourse and negative emotions between all of us and attach a stigma to certain messages or certain people so that we wouldn’t be caught dead listening to anything someone else has to say that contradicts them. Then questions aren’t asked, information is not shared, and when someone even starts to try to share something or have a thoughtful debate the backlash is so severe they never try again. They don’t have to take down a website or a social media platform, they just have to create division among its members. Friendships end, families are severed, forums threads close, users are banned, civility is lost. No thoughtful dialogue is ever possible in a world like that, but then neither is learning or discovering or improving. We let them control us this way when in reality all of us want the same things as each other, we really do, and that is quite different from those who are doing this to us.
So, as in this case, critical information about our health, medical care, and food supply is censored, but not by them at first - but by each other with our refusal to even listen because we don’t like a particular person involved. They win.
But what happens when the powers that be can’t rely on our infighting to control what we hear? What do they do when someone starts to allow others who are qualified (like the Means siblings,) to speak up loud enough for the whole public to hear? That’s a pretty big threat to those holding the power if they can’t get them to shut up. That’s when true censorship starts. The first thing they do is set out to destroy the messenger’s career and credibility, as they did with all three people in this video, and if they can’t do that they destroy their reputation and image so that we are too scared or too averse to associate with them. It becomes too risky to our other relationships to admit any association or thoughtful positive opinions. Better to just avoid. Then we don’t hear and … we lose.
Recently we all saw the next thing they do when that doesn’t work by how they will take over all social media and the mainstream news to prevent any dissenting voice from being heard at all, and only one narrative ever is heard or read. I sure hope that never happens with the truth that is within this video, because so far there is free-flowing, uncensored information out there both misinformation and truths, about: ketogenic and other clean, unprocessed, sugar-free diets helping a lot of health issues, our food supply, and how compromised the FDA, big pharma, big food, and big medical is. People may get a lot of misinformation thrown at them about all those things but the freedom to inform them of the truth is still there as well, and they have the ability to consider it all. Truth eventually rises to the top and misinformation eventually sifts out the bottom. Every time. The only real threat to anyone when there is no censorship is truth itself, to those who have an agenda to control things.
They would love to label what the Means siblings expose in this interview as misinformation, yet everyone here knows for certain it is all factual and absolutely accurate. It is not coming from irresponsible people with no concern for the health and well being of others or who have deeply selfish agendas and ambitions. They have no financial conflict of interest, nothing to gain, and everything to lose. But someone in a position of authority will want everyone to believe it’s misinformation because it threatens their agendas, and they do have countless huge financial conflicts of interest.
(And for those of you who think Casey Means’ new book is a financial conflict of interest, do you really believe she wouldn’t have made 1000x more from simply remaining a Stanford trained surgeon for the rest of her life??? She is trying to get the truth out there to as many people as possible, and these days you have to write a book in order to do that because of all the censoring in media and journalism.)
And they do this with more than just the subject of diets, food, and medicine. I’ve started to refuse to believe sensationalized character assassinations about anyone anymore and I go to find out for myself without letting what others have said to cloud my judgement during that process. It has opened up a whole new world of other people to me who are all wide awake, and actually talking and debating, thoughtfully, patiently, kindly, just like in this interview. We just needed to remove the narrators’ narrative. LOL
This interview is a good example of the damage this character assassination does. How many people would benefit greatly from what is shared in this interview? How many will never hear it because of some hate for a man that was largely crafted by people with hidden agendas and not from their own first hand witness or experience with him? But because the manufactured image is so despised, they never give anything connected to him a chance and won’t hear what these two amazing whistleblowers share. Yet as you saw when watching this, he lets his guests do ALL the talking and is good at prompting them to keep talking. (I especially love the moment Tucker realizes how a clean unprocessed diet impacts the mental acuity and speed of his guests’ minds and how much better their brains work. I just grinned so deeply.) So even if you really don’t like something as basic as say, his personality, it doesn’t get in the way of the interview at all because he isn’t doing the talking. Not like it does with so many other journalists/interviewers, who constantly interrupt their guests and take as much if not more of the spotlight by giving their own long diatribes throughout, robbing their guests from actually speaking more.
The next thing we all should ask ourselves is why did these two incredibly brave and highly successful, intellectual people, who are very center, if not somewhat old-fashioned (unadulterated) left, choose to share this very important information with someone like Tucker? Why not sit down with anyone else for this length of an interview? The answer to that is quite disturbing: because no one else wants to take that risk, (read: they have no balls,) or … they have financial ties or cushy positions they don’t want to lose by exposing these things. Out of all the journalists out there that should be scrambling to let the American public hear these whistleblowers … we only get crickets.
They chose Tucker for a reason. You don’t have to like him for his personality, you don’t have to agree with his politics, but you can’t fault him for his willingness to let his guests speak truth to the public. And now that he is free of those financial ties that held him back when syndicates controlled him, he can share anything he wants to with the public and no one can destroy his career over it. So now the truth about big pharma, our medical institutions, and our government are being spoken openly without censoring for the first time ever.