Tells us nothing we did not know but basically where a reviewer knows the writer of a studyvthen bias comes in. It is why @richard that any study not double bonded is not really worth it, including bed that support us.
Single blinded science reviews - bias
richard
(Richard Morris)
#2
It’s worth blinding peer review if for no other reason than to prevent the “Matilda effect” (where a male name appearing first increases it’s chance of passing review). I’m totally a fan of blinding the scientists involved so there isn’t an inherent appeal top authority and the science stands for itself.
ianrobo
(ianrobo)
#3
in the twitter thread I picked this up on it was fascinating to read how may Dr’s were commenting on just what really happens and how happy they are to see this.
ianrobo
(ianrobo)
#4
oh BTW Richard the thread was not about food studies but obviously still relevant.
