Where was the Mikaela Petersen āorangesā anecdote?
I tested some navel oranges against my keto carnivorish base diet and ended up with sore (pins and needles) finger joints and a higher than standard morning, fasting blood glucose (5.9 mmol/l).
Test was one orange after 2nd meal. 3 tests, one week apart.
Neuropathy, immune mediated inflammation, oxalate dump?
The first reason is you cannot oxidize fructose or blood glucose any longer like the average person from only eating large portions of meat/protein or only eating meat and not enough vegetation long-term?
The second reason, the fiber in the fruit takes longer to process so the fructose is not absorbed as fast as eating a free sugar that shock your insulin secretions into an enormous chronic spike?
Why Whole Foods are better!
Third reason, your more intolerant to the fructose because you do not eat enough fruit to to give your body enough hormetic shock to withstand inflammation of what little sugar your giving it.
The last reason, your body is now dependent on the vicious circle of storing carbohydrates rather than oxidizing both fat and carbohydrates. (hint: your only oxidizing protein into sugar/glucose)
Sugar is not technically a bad thing until you start eating more than your muscle tissue (without fatty deposits?) can burn at one time. The less lean skeletal muscle you have in ratio to adipose tissue size, the less sugar you eat or can eat.
Fatty liver and/or pancreas (eat more eggs) then you will need more insulin when you over eat sugar or any amount or type of sugar.
Yet another post full of absolutes with little to no nuanceā¦ nor any evidenceā¦
even though 100% completely unnecessary for lifeā¦
more nutritional orthodoxy ā¦
amongst many other errors
2/10 you can do better ā¦
Maybe you could show some evidence to challenge my view on said errors that are not an n=1 placebo paradox?
I simply want to see something real, scientific double cross blind placebo, research, empirical cross-validation, historical evidence, give me something to sink my fangs into about this silly idea about humans only eating meat? I come up empty handed every time so that tells me something is wrong?
I really want to believe in ghosts, if you ever catch one and trap it in a box let me know?
OK
Do we agree that there are no āessentialā dietary carbohydrates?
Edit to addā¦ as you are the one making the absoluitst statements I think it should be me asking for the
Resistant Starch is essential to human life if you want to safely eat protein without eating so much fat.
Dripping with starchā¦lol
Bushmen are clever?
Iām not an absolutist that is used more in a political context, I am open to common sense and saving lives?
So you are making a claim that resistant starch is an essential nutrient along with fat and proteinā¦ correct? And your evidence is a photo?
Correct!
Your not going get any closer to fact then a priceless picture like that!
Beautiful picture at that.
Well if that is the sum total of your evidenceā¦
I can find nothing that supports your claimā¦ soā¦
Tell them that, I know those sweet potatoes must look horrifying to youā¦lol
How many thousands of years or the quote āmillions of yearsā they been eating starch?
Look at that nice chunk of starchy tuber root, thatās part of dinner?
Where is the famed Bunny wall of published text supporting your argumentā¦
Seems like your pictorial evidence is rather lacking in substanceā¦ maybe the tuber is for feeding their cows?
Anyway as you seem incapable of providing the āevidenceā you usually so adore Iāll pass on this conversation.
Most of human life would be extinct if it were not for resistant starch in its original resistant and natural formā¦ that a fact!
Interesting that the āscienceā you normally rely so heavily upon doesnāt support your view that resistant starch is an essential nutrient along with fat and protein thenā¦
How inconvenient.
Not so much ā¦ if there are no āessentialā dietary carbohydrates then that resistant starch you appear to love seems a bit āunessentialā. Or maybe you have a ādifferent opinionā rather than a factually supported statement this time?
I think you might misunderstand what resistant starch is, it is not a carbohydrate that is required by the human body it required by the bacteria that live in your gut and if they all die, you the host die with them.
When you eat only meat your gut becomes full of amino acid eating bacteria which smell like a dead body eventually. And your gut then becomes an easy target for very bad pathogens eventually.
Again another statement of"fact" which is simply your opinion and appears unsupported by evidenceā¦ has your account been hacked by a vegan advocate perchance?
I wish it were my opinion just looking at the research on ex-carnivores is scary in itself.
Itās right here on the forum Iām sure you will find itā¦
Question is are sure you want to read it?
