Now, it is very trendy to be in favor of intermittent fasting, and even directly fasting in general.
However, at least in keto circles, caloric restriction is not much discussed.
Myself, I am doing a PSMF for second time, and it is clear that it does a lot of good to me. A PSMF is keto, but it is also caloric restriction.
Between the two PSMF, I gained weight, but I continued eating keto. In fact, at my highest weight (when I went to see my doctor again), a blood test showed I was in ketosis yet.
And during that time of increasing weight, I tried all kinds of intermittent fasting: 16h, 23h (OMAD), I did 5-day water fasts âŚ
But for some reason, I do not feel intermittent fasting does any good to me (of course, I could be wrong, since I do not see my inside). And I am very hungry when I restrict the eating time period.
Instead, with caloric restriction, I am eating 4/5 times per day, eating little every time. But I am pretty satisfied, with much less hunger. Except when I wake up in the morning, then I need to eat. I spend about 10/11 hours fasting per night.
And with caloric restriction, and PSMF, I really notice the improvements in myself.
So, my question is: could it be that what really matters is caloric restriction? Some people may accomplish caloric restriction with OMAD, others with PSMF and 4/5 meals per day.
Also, there should be a grey area: eating little at night counts at ânot-fastingâ in absolute terms, but if you eat little, I would say one is âfasting a littleâ.
Any ideas?