The presenters I’ve listened to on Youtube refer to “insulin resistance” without regard to cells need to restore depleted energy. If I’m sedentary and my cells energy levels are topped off it’s predictable that they may decline to absorb more. In that situation the glucose goes to fat cells unless those too have reached their limits. Then the glucose spends too much time in the blood and damages things. Isn’t the solution to deplete muscle cells and fat cells of energy so they are receptive to absorbing glucose when it appears in the blood stream? If insulin resistance means not absorbing glucose even when energy stores are depleted wouldn’t that create critical medical conditions. If cells are only resistant to absorbing glucose when they are already full of energy why not call it glucose resistance instead of insulin resistance?
I am not sedentary. My BMR is 1400-1600 calories per day. My typical activities and exercise burn another 600-800 calories per day. 75% of those calories is walking. The other 200 is burned from alternate days of of cardio and strength training. I imagine my muscle cells are restoring stored energy most of the time so when glucose appears in the blood stream it is cleared rapidly by cells that need it.
I’m upping net carbs from 20 to 50 grams to see if there is an effect on exercise intensity and on my perpetual light headedness that is not an asset at work.
I’ve been doing 20 net carbs for 5 months. May be that’s too low for someone doing my level of activity. I’m not getting stronger or bigger under the bar and I’m tired of sluggish legs and a fuzzy head.
Am I missing something?