How much weight loss is too much


#1

I believe spending more time in maintanence and repair (IF) equals a longer health span, possibly longer life span. IF controls BG levels, inflammation, and much more. IF is enjoyable. I enjoy eating big meals on a OMAD minimum (mostly 36 hrs. between meal IF). I lose weight. At 214 I wanted to go to 190. At 190 I decided maybe 165. Apparently, if I go to the edge of the BMI tables, I could go down 135 to 140. Is this smart? How low is too low? I sort of figure, without will power I will plateau. I also figure this thread will move in that direction. Let’s assume, I can control my weight at any level. What is best? Will I have to give up my fasting routine because I can’t take in enough calories? I guess I’ll just go the edge of normal on the BMI chart and start finding a maintenance routine. Thoughts?


(Brian) #2

I’m not sure anyone can really answer that question for you. How do you feel at 190? 180? 170? 160? 150? 140? I’m not sure there is a right answer that anyone else could point you towards.

I happen to feel best on the upper part of the curve. As an adult, I’ve been all the way from the 140s to the 290s. The place that felt the best to me was around the 190s. That’s still considered heavy for my height but since that’s where I’ve felt the best in the past, that’s my goal. If, when I get there, I feel like I’d feel better losing some more, I will. If I feel like I’m where I need to be, I won’t.

I’m not convinced that underweight people are healthier. I remember of something I heard sometime back during an interview of numerous people over the age of 100, that the general theme of the people in that group was that they were not generally underweight and healthy. No, they weren’t way overweight, either. Having a reserve of at least some body fat seemed to be a good thing.


(Lonnie Hedley) #3

During my last EF, I hit 136.6. I’m 6 foot. So, I’m lean. This morning I was back to 140.0. I IF daily, but more out of convenience than anything else. At my heaviest, I was around 195. I felt like crap. I’m definitely most comfortable where I am now. Although, weight is not something I’m concerned with. I’m most concerned with how I feel. If I gained all the weight back and felt great, I wouldn’t care. I don’t think that would be the case though. For now, I’ll continue eating twice a day, perfect macros, nearly 2000 calories, until something happens where I no longer feel best at this weight.


#4

Lonnie, that’s a big help. The BMI charts probably put you underweight right?


#5

Thanks, Brian Good input. Probably best to start maintenance right in the middle of the BMI normal range and adjust fast routine.


(Lonnie Hedley) #6

Probably at my weight to height ratio, but I don’t pay too much attention. When looking at charts, I still estimate I’m 18-20% body fat. Makes me wonder how some people say they are 5’8ā€, 230lbs, and only 25% body fat. But, when looking at pictures and ourselves in a mirror, body dismorphia could be playing a role in those estimates. I’d like to get a dexa scan, but can’t justify the cost for something that isn’t needed. Needs vs. wants.


(Sarah ) #7

your body fat percentage is relative to your lean body mass, which includes muscle and bone and connective tissues… some of us weigh more in this area than others. The ā€œIm just big bonedā€ excuse. is mostly an excuse, but its still somewhat true. And of course, muscle mass does vary widely.


#8

Sarah, funny you should mention ā€œjust big bonedā€. My mother use to tell her fat son (me), don’t worry about your weight you are just big boned. She was wrong. Thanks for your input!


(Rob) #9

If the science and experience behind Keto has taught us anything it’s that weight doesn’t make us matabolically healthy or unhealthy. As long as you are healthy on the inside and not too heavy to strain joints etc. you should be OK.

How many people here are still obese but have reversed their major diseases? I would like to get down to 50lbs lighter than I am but I won’t obsess about it as long as I’m healthy inside.


(Todd Allen) #10

I think it is better to focus on body compostion or maybe body fat % instead of weight. Aim for a body fat goal and try to get there while gaining or at least without losing muscle or bone.


(Jennifer) #11

Funny, I am big boned. At 5’3ā€, I have a LBM of 115 pounds. At 25% body fat, I should weigh about 155 pounds that has me at 27 BMI. Still obese. I would have to get down to140 to get to the normal BMI range and that would put me about 17% bf. Very low for a female.

Get a DEXA scan done and you will know exactly where you stand and then use that as your guide.


(Sarah ) #12

this page has some useful info about body fat and also some pix that might give you a rough idea where you stand. i agree that body fat is a better indicator of healthy weight, than BMI, and for those of us who really have no idea what a healthy weight is, this chart can be useful
https://www.freedieting.com/body-fat-calculator


#13

If obesity is the result of a problem, then obesity is a disease. And therefore inherently unhealthy. What’s at issue isn’t body weight but body fat. Scientists now know that fat isn’t benign, it’s an endocrine organ. And it has detrimental effects on health.


(Todd Allen) #14

It seems to depend on the person and the nature of their fat, some people can carry a tremendous amount of body fat and have excellent health. In general fat under the skin, especially when the fat cells stay small is healthy, even when one has a lot.


(Rob) #15

I get what you’re saying but even this may be too black or white. There are lots of people with some or even lots of ā€˜excess’ body fat (working off the six-pack abs model that has only existed for a century or less) who are and remain metabolically/physiologically healthy. Body fat IS an organ but doesn’t have to be banished to be healthy. Fat deposition is a symptom not a cause so I’m not sure if it can be classed as the disease per se.

Just my 2c.


#16

I’m still a very long way from having to figure out a goal weight. What I’ve kind of considered is that I want to have as much muscle as possible, and then a body fat percentage that seems reasonable. I don’t care about the BMI charts when some athletes with absolutely amazing bodies would be considered obese on those charts. I’m not chasing a number on the scale.

There’s also the whole thing about Phinney weight, the weight at which it’s fairly easy to maintain without huge amounts of effort. If I was trying to get my weight so low that I’d have to go to extremes, then I’d start worrying about it becoming psychologically unhealthy. I figure maybe my body will tell me when it’s at a weight that it likes.


#17

I remember once I was in school with a girl who looked like she could have been an elf. I was randomly looking at her hands and wrists and how tiny they were. My hands and wrists were absolutely gigantic in comparison. I definitely do not have petite bones.


#18

Thinking 155 which should be at about 10% body fat if I’m looking at things right. Sounds healthy, possible, and sustainable. Should be able to still enjoy fasting. Great input folks!