I never had such rules. 70% fat is virtually inevitably overeating to me… (But practically totally is, I never do things perfect enough to avoid overeating with that high fat percentage.)
It’s all about the relation between our energy need (or target or how should I say it) and protein need I suppose. There is our taste too. It’s fine to have 50% or 95% fat if that suits the one in question.
I used to have 65% and it took a lot of time to lower it but without that I hardly lose fat (maybe on OMAD but I can’t stick to that).
Anorexogetic is great for me - except when it works too well and results in overeating (my 5MAD days with tiny meals).
I try to minimize my protein to avoid wasteful, unnecessary protein eating (and overeating).
Why we have those numbers? Because people like fixed numbers even if they don’t work for them at all. IDK why, I am not like them. I like to find my own ways. And I couldn’t care less about my fat percentage as long as I reach my goals.
And 70% is fine for many, I suppose. But not for all and it’s not a magical number, it doesn’t really matter. We need enough energy, nutrition, protein…
Of course but I try to do my best not to… I ate quite much protein even then.
Increasing protein and fat are way too easy for me and satiation doesn’t come into the way often. (And if it did, I could just add more meals.)
Perfect amount. As long as they don’t take away my other protein sources…
I ate more on my experimental low-carb plant-based days before I discovered gluten… And that was the lowest, by far… It was too carby but one needs to eat something and I wouldn’t like to eat mostly fat.
I have no idea about ketones but I don’t care anyway. My body is elated if I eat very low plant carbs and it refuses to cooperate below 130g protein. And I eat as lean as I comfortably can already, way leaner than I could years ago.
I just can’t wrap my head around low protein (like 60g. it’s a really small piece of meat), it’s just impossible for some of us.