Slightly dismaying article here, at least at first glance; I’d appreciate people’s thoughts.
I quote:
'Hall and his colleagues confined 17 overweight and obese patients to the hospital for two months, where they measured their every movement and carefully controlled what they were eating. (Diet researchers call this the “gold standard,” since it was an extremely well-controlled experiment, with all food provided, and it used the best technologies for measuring energy expenditure and body composition.)
For the first month of the study, participants were put on a baseline diet, which was designed to be similar to what they reported they were eating outside the hospital, including lots of sugary carbohydrates. For the second month, the participants got the same amount of calories and protein as they did in the first month of the study, but this time they ramped up the amount of fat in their food and got far fewer carbs.’
Result - no difference in weight loss between the two groups. The article goes on:
‘“In this case,” Hall said, “we saw daily insulin secretion drop substantially within the first week and stay at a low level. But we only saw a small transient increase in energy expenditure during the first couple of weeks of the [low-carb] diet, and that essentially vanished by the end of the study.”
…
“According to the insulin-carbohydrate model, we should have seen an acceleration in the rate of body fat loss when insulin secretion was cut by 50 percent,”’
Question: is this actually what the “insulin-carbohydrate model” would predict? To my mind, since the two groups were fed the same number of calories, I would not expect any difference in weight loss. I’ve always thought that keto weight loss results from reduced desire for food as the fat-adapted keto-er derives energy from stored reserves. Since the participants in this study were not allowed reduce their food consumption, I wouldn’t have expected them to lose weight. Am I wrong?