Hi Chris,
I’ve wrestled with the difference between “what feels right” and “what is right based on facts” too. Its a difficult issue because, from what I’ve read (both the medical literature on pubmed and the advice from experts) there is no consensus in the literature. You can select a subset of the evidence and conclude that fasting is great and you can select a subset of the literature and conclude that you will get better health outcomes by not fasting. I think we are far from untying the Gordian knot that is human metabolism.
In the absence of clear and convincing evidence that one choice is better, i think what you are left with is doing what feels right for you. That’s a glib way of saying that genetics and epigenetics are different than mine, your behavioral/psychological issues with food are different than mine, etc. My thinking sort of follows the advice on exercise that the best form of exercise is the one that your will actually follow. If you feel good fasting and it helps you achieve your health goals then run with it - if not, that’s ok too.