I’ve been doing exercise since Febuary and keto since March. I skip breakfast 5 days a week, eat nothing one day a week and am flexible about timing 2 meals the day after the zero calorie day. I don’t snack. My current weight is at the mid point of my BMI, 144.
Febuary 14th I recorded 161/85. On August 9th I recorded 105/51 and seem to be solidly in the teens. My assessment is the exercise gets the credit but clearly keto did not interfere. There were no medications in the mix.
My exercise consists of walking 1-2 hours 5 days a week at mostly 3.3 mph with HR at 55-65% of max, 3 30 minute sessions of steady state cardio at 70-75% of max HR, and 3 60 minute lifting sessions per week. I believe walking was the most important to BP but they all contributed. I walk and do SS cardio on the zero calorie day. Eating or not makes no difference I can see to exercise.
I suspect that losing weight without physical activity costs muscle mass. A well functing metabolism needs to be restoring energy to depleted muscle cells. That means they need to be depleted which isn’t happening much if you are sedentary.
I needed to lose 25-30 pounds and 3" of waist line to get back to high school trim. Mission accomplished. I would love to stay this lean and regain the 25 pounds as lean body mass over the next 2 years. Can a 69 year old do that? There’s only one way to find out, n=1.