Years ago I was trained as a scientist and engineer. I operate as a manager and a software developer now. Sometimes my brain just won’t let go of paradoxes and the like.
I’ve read Jason Fung’s guide to fasting, some of the Verta Health Blogs and listened to probably a 100+ hours of video by leading doctors and scientists in the LCHF arena.
Studies prove that calorie restriction diets don’t work. Typically weight loss is not permanent. See below the Biggest Loser study.
But fasting is a form of calorie restriction in the sense that in a given period you are consuming less (or no) calories. Jason Fung has data that says BMR does not go down when fasting and we know that BMR does go down when you eat smaller meals for extended periods of time.
I am wrestling with this paradox. I’m thinking the form of calorie restriction that does not work is smaller meals. Can we agree on that?
So if fasting works (IF, EF) to lose weight and not lower BMR then the real key is the lack of insulin during fasting that makes the difference. I’m guessing some of you will say well “duh” but I have to point out that fasting is fewer calories and calorie restriction is fewer calories.
What say you friends and LCHF associates?
Please note that I am doing IF 18/6 and will start EF after my next set of blood work. So I’m not challenging the wisdom of fasting. Only pointing out the unspoken obvious.
https://www.amazon.com/Complete-Guide-Fasting-Intermittent-Alternate-Day/dp/1628600012