A kiwi company today has fallen fowl of the NZ Govt after a complaint was lodged (by a competing product) that they cannot call their hydration sports drink such because it does not contain enough sugar.
Either they need to increase the sugar FIVE times, or remove any references to the product hydrating or being an electrolyte drink.
Is there any science backing up claims that in order for someone to claim this hydrates (better than water alone), that’s it’s an electrolyte drink that there needs to be sugar?
That sugar and salt have to be balanced else the body can’t absorb the salts?