Not sure how many people follow Petro D. over at Hyperlipid, but he’s killing me right now.
First, there was the broadside assault on Omega 3s:
For those “not in the know”, his theory is that PUFAs (polyunsaturated fatty acids) cause fat cells to become insulin sensitive. MUFAs (monounsaturated fats) less so, but still some insulin sensitivity. Saturated fat causes fat cells to become insulin resistant.
In short, insulin sensitive fat cells = you will overeat and gain weight; insulin resistant fat cells = you will not overeat and not gain weight.
The broadside above basically takes those miracle fish and fish oil PUFAs and says they cause you to overeat. Ugh! No fish now?
Then, he discusses “ultra processed food”:
Now, even I think there’s something about processing of food that can make it more palatable.
And he reviews a study (on rats – almost none of the studies are done on humans) where there are three diets: normal (crapinabag); ultra-processed garbage but with low PUFAs; ultra-processed garbage but high PUFAs.
The thinnest rats ate…the ultra-processed garbage but with low PUFAs. Gah!
By the way, when looking at the study in the bottom link above, CX:0 = saturated fat; CX:1 = MUFA; CX:2 or CX:3 = PUFA. So, C8:0 is a saturated fat, C18:2 is a PUFA. Linoleic acid is C18:2 and is the evil PUFA and is an omega 6 fatty acid. α-Linolenic acid (ALA) is C18:3 and is an omega 3 fatty acid.
He’s causing me to rethink fish. And whether “processed” food is “bad” because of palatability or because of PUFAs (though fireinabottle had me going that way anyway).
Ugh. Is nothing sacred?