There’s some disagreement about this. People like Paul Mason and Jason Fung say we need no fibre at all, whereas Robert Lustig feels it’s necessary. On the other hand, while Dr. Lustig approves of keto, that is not his main focus, which is on eating real foods, whether one’s diet is keto or not. He’s definitely not talking about carnivore!
Dr. Phinney doesn’t outright say we don’t need fibre, but he does comment that β-hydroxybutyrate, one of the principal ketone bodies, is as good as or better than butyrate for the bowel (butyrate being the chemical produced by our intestinal bacteria that is supposed to be so good for our colon).
Of our members who eat keto but not carnivore, there are some who feel that fibre is essential to their bodies. On the other hand, just as many feel that fibre aggravates their irritable bowel, leaky gut, or Crohn’s disease. The majority of us don’t seem to notice an effect one way or another.
But the long-term carnivores I’m aware of, if they talk about fibre at all, say they have no digestive problems from the lack of plant fibre in their diet. I suppose the quantity of fat in the diet lubricates things? Also, meats are close to completely digestible, so there is much less residue, and what there is of it is easy to evacuate. Don’t confuse constipation, which is difficulty or strain while moving one’s bowel, with a lessened frequency of the need to evacuate. The latter is perfectly normal (except in the eyes of a laxative manufacturer trying to sell product, lol!).