This one talks about red meat marketing and industry subsidies and how we should all be eating less meat. It leans heavily on animal welfare which emotionally charges the argument. Animal welfare should really be another topic. It’s a critical thinking error, a logical fallacy, that is, if all else fails appeal to emotion.
When facing this sort of interweaving of topics it’s hard to argue the case for meat consumption and keto. How would one go about communicating against this? The lawyer advocating this is giving talks all around Australia which is a worry.