This movement conflates a lot of different things.
Part of the problem is people perceive a link between fat shaming and food shaming. You cannot shame a food! Perhaps you can shame a producer of empty calories but that is different. The reason people advocate for this is that who among us who when overweight and eating SAD hasn’t hesitated to get that second piece of cake while family and friends watch?I remember my thin boss (actually a nice guy normally) making an unintentionally nasty comment when I, who was working late, went to a conference room to scrounge for leftovers so I didn’t have to order in.The comment was not made to the thin men who were also eating, I left that job in 1993 and still remember it.
People want permission to eat Cocoa Puffs, they don’t want to be judged. Especially people who are overweight and insulin resistant (or worse) because their system creates an addictive compulsion to eat. They want to be told it is ok and it doesn’t matter. They don’t understand that sugar triggers the compulsion. The people who are metabolically healthy do not understand the appeal or the compulsion, any more than someone who dislikes gambling can understand that compulsion.
I do think that health care does judge fat people differently and we all know examples. My favorite is when fat doctors do. That does have to change no matter what you eat. However, the nutrition information that doctors provide has to improve
Yes fat people should not be shamed. Yes fat is the last accepted prejudice because conventional perception is that it is usually “the fat person’s fault” Too many people still think T2 is caused by being overweight rather than being overweight is a symptom of IR which leads to Pre T2 and possibly T2. Since the cause is misunderstood, the treatment goes off the rails. Especially when you factor in TOFIs, what are they supposed to do?
The anti diet movement may be part of an anorexic’s treatment but they have a different problem than someone who weighs 300 lbs. It is like treating T1s and T2s the same. They are different diseases.
The reality is that the insulin response to carbs triggers the desire to eat and not enough people realize that. I did watch Oprah’s show on the injectables and what I loved was her realization that it did not matter what diet she was on, prior to the injectable most foods made her crave more but this is not universally true. As she said, the people who are not heavy are not that way out of will power but because they do not have the same compulsion to eat. She claims she never knew that until the injectable took away her compulsion. People who are metabolically healthy do not have those cravings. Even if they love ice cream or chocolate cake, eating a slice or bowl every once in awhile is not the problem, they eat the cake and are satisfied. As opposed to the metabolically unhealthy who eat the chocolate cake which then makes you want the ice cream and the takeout pizza afterward.
Most dieters do regain within 5 years. I have gained and lost the same 50 lbs 3x since 2009 and it is frustrating. Thank you set point. Most diets work for me for around 6 months and then I stop losing. I am at that stage now (with another 50 to lose that seems to never happen) with time restricted eating (don’t eat past 6 most days and exercise). I can accept that I will never be a size 4 and healthy at the same time. Dieting, changing your way of eating, restricting only works up to a point for most people. Every time a diet fails or stalls, the person gets frustrated but most the time it is set point science not the fault of the person. The simple answer is that conventional diet advice is a disaster. I don’t consider gastric bypass or injectables that answer for me.
In this respect all of the Anti Fat Shaming movements are a good thing. However they fail because they treat fat as unavoidable in the young. TBH, for the 50 year old in the story, whose body has gotten used to 300 lbs, it probably is unless she radically changes her diet. However, for the 15 year old who is slightly overweight, it is not. However telling them high sugar cereals are ok is not the way to protect their future health as we all know. We can debate with the rest of the world whether that 15 year old would be better off eating strawberries, steaks, eggs or beans or multigrain toast or tofu, but shopping in the center of the supermarket, no.
I was a thin kid until puberty. If I could go back to my 15 year old self, who was already dieting, I would encourage her to eat a balanced diet, the meat and potatoes of my grandmother, while limiting sugar to special occasions. I also would tell her not to use food as entertainment but to eat when she was hungry. I would like to think I would never have gained in the same way but it may be wishful thinking. The problem is that kid grew up on sugared cereal, devil dogs, pasta and pizza and CICO. I disliked meat except for hamburgers and breaded chicken. When I did CICOs, I still ate pasta and bread, so I wanted more, always. I have tried every diet in creation. When we cleaned out our spare room 25 years ago for our new baby, I think we threw out 30 diet books (including Atkins). Limiting carbs is the only thing that works for me, but only up to a point. Still it is better than eating crap
As for intuitive eating, I tried that, my intuition led me to eat pizza, pasta, cake, pies and sometimes sugar cubes. I guess my body was deprived of sugar and that is why I needed to eat it