Two studies how to refute?

[ODE]

Yes. I would say “treat” rather than “cure”. When under treatment, symptoms being gone is meaningless. While taking a medication for any condition, the symptoms would be gone. But they reappear as soon as someone stops taking the medications.

Well that would be ridicolous to expect ur limbs to grow back after uve already lost them to the poison, our specie is not suppose to eat this much sugar and carbs. Any diet that eliminates those poisons is preventive cure. Its funny how they would call it a cure and a breakthru if the doctors could make couple mill each, but aint none making a bank with fasting…

Also, the term diabetes is used when a patient displays certain signs such as high blood sugar. If the signs and symptoms aren’t there, they are not diagnosable as having diabetes. If they return to the diet that caused the disease they will get it again. This is true of any disease you cure. Second exposure to the pathogenic agent will cause the disease again, unless your body has become immune. It may be true to say the person remains insulin resistant, but not that they have diabetes.

Great post!

[brownfat]

The thing that bothers me about saying “cure” is misleading and keto is only a “treatment” is that it implies that SAD is a healthy way to eat for people that don’t have diabetes.

I agree 100% with everything you wrote. In my case I feel completely cured with many comorbidities of diabetes fading or gone. My tolerance for carbohydrate has improved and I can again eat a range of vegetables and even some fruit and sustain low normal blood sugar.

I have no doubt that eating too much carbohydrate could wreck my progress and would put me back in a diabetic state if I really pushed it. But I’m not going to do that. I’m comfortable with the need to eat well below my carbohydrate threshhold whatever it may be for the rest of my life and my diabetes will never return.

[carolT]

The nail in my head hurts. When it’s removed, I’m not cured because if you put the nail back in it will hurt again!

[OgreZed]

The nail in my head hurts. When it’s removed, I’m not cured because if you put the nail back in it will hurt again!

But if they simply treat the visible symptoms and cut the nail off at the skin line and the skin heals over, no one would diagnose you with a nail in your head, even though one is there.

And what damage is occurring because they only treated the known symptom?

[ODE]

But if they simply treat the visible symptoms and cut the nail off at the skin line and the skin heals over, no one would diagnose you with a nail in your head, even though one is there.

And what damage is occurring because they only treated the known symptom?

Most “modern treatments” for you to keep ur nail addiction going are more greed, enabling and money addiction than treating. Wanting or saying there is no completely traceless result ending cure after such long-term self-harm (aided or not its ultimately ur choice) is only arrogant. For most people remission type symptomless state is cure enough, it should be for you too.