This is totally my mind wandering wherever it will this morning, but because I like to be able to see the logic behind things, I got to thinking about what logic there was behind fat not increasing your hunger hormone, insulin, and carbohydrates drastically increasing it, versus protein only mildly increasing it.
So, here’s my totally off-the-wall, probably idiotic, theory.
If ancient man was primarily a hunter/gatherer, the condition of the animals being hunted and consumed could possibly trigger the body to prepare for hard times or good times.
For instance, if the animals being harvested were fat and sassy, you would be consuming more fat and letting the body know that there was lots more where that came from because obviously they were thriving.
On the other hand, however, if there was a drought condition or other environmental problems for the prey, they would be leaner. The proportion of fat on them would be lower, so more protein would moderately signal the human’s body that there might be a problem coming up, and it might be a good idea to store some fat.
If prey was scarce, and humans had to survive on roots, seeds, plants, fruits, and berries, the body would say “Hey hard times, need to store fat NOW!”
I’ll go away now, LOL.