Zero Carb vs Zero Carbon is a false dichotomy, I think.
We are what we ate ate, burped, and farted. Food responsibility?
As a counter information source, what about the ‘Carbon Cycle’ that is not based on fossilised sunlight release (fossil fuels), and supports carbon into soil re-sequestration?
What we consume leads us to choices.
The first clip was made by one of my favourite animation studios. It doesn’t match my biases.
A scientist explains: https://youtu.be/45P4uxd5M58?t=2635
That whole methane thing is very complex. I followed people on Twitter who discuss that, and it’s often portrayed as one thing by anti-cow people, but the actuality is quite a bit different.
Not sure where is the truth regarding the impact of life stock on the planet.
But this maybe a solution.
Thanks @Alpha Omar . Thought provoking. “Clean meat” (they already coined a marketing term) from tissue cell culture techniques breaks the dichotomy of real meat and vegan meat. To me, that’s a good thing. Biology and ethics need be complex and cover huge variety to result in a human survival investment portfolio.
Technology and meat production concerns me because it seems disconnected. Like a mechanistic biological action at a cellular level does not always translate to a complete explanation of whole organism disease or health.
I do love the science and philosophy frisson that occurs when humans are humans and we question what we eat and why.