Joe Rogan, Dom and some bloke


#21

Hmmm, where to start. There are some good thinking points in this podcast.

Here are some opinionated observations.

The Joe Rogan podcast previous to this one with Chris Kresser and Joel Kahn. It is excellent in the context of listening to the way the information is provided by Layne Norton in this podcast. Layne is based in a calories-in, calories-out (CICO) education, which he uses to contextualise his points. He does rubbish Gary Taubes’ hormone/insulin hypothesis of the cause of obesity. But Layne does not do it convincingly.

Layne is a cherry picker across the range of types of studies. In one segment of this podcast both guests define when they are citing science from animal studies compared to the variety of human studies. That clarity is rapidly lost as the blokey bro talk increased in volume. Layne picks his cherries without clear references. Joe pulls him up once in a while to ask where he gets the information, and it’s often a confounded single observational study, Chris Kresser clearly explained that single studies that had not been reproduced could be found to support any side of a nutrition science debate. We witness it ad nauseum in this podcast.

Layne has a PhD and a world record and says some very interesting things to contemplate. A main point that grabbed my attention was that apparently all this nutrition debate has no benefit, or maybe even relevance, unless it is combined with exercise. Implying that exercise is more important than nutrition for health. In Layne’s case, that exercise seems to be based in lifting weights. That point, and Joe Rogan’s repeated references to “discipline” (aka willpower) and people being ‘weak’ (presumably mentally when it comes to eating food), took me back to thinking about an alternate proposition presented by Gary Taubes that I found to be observationally (n=1) true:

Without the energy being physiologically available, as blood ketones or blood glucose, the mental drive motivation to be active is absent in a sedentary person. If energy is stored in the body as fat and is hormonally inaccessible, then the body remains sedentary conserving energy. However, when blood ketones are available, when body fat stores are made available in a low insulin environment, it is hard to sit still. The activity is a consequence of the available energy. Rather than activity being a factor of willpower. The egg before the chicken. Nutrition precedes activity. The nutritious egg comes before the active chicken.

Another observation is to see the expression of personalities in this panel. It may be just personalities. But for the sake of anecdotal spice, I agree that Keto Dom seemed clear thinking and clear, calm communicating, whereas carbed up Layne was a bit shouty, foggy and mixed up in his story telling.

Layne has a cool base platform that seemed to attract Joe’s invitation, that being that Layne calls out things that he sees as BS (not Bachelor of Science). Self-labelled skepticism is an admirable trait for a curious scientist and makes for entertainment value in a podcast panel. But I wished Layne could have been a bit clearer on how he identified that an interesting pile of brown was indeed a bovine turd rather than a collapsed keto friendly mudcake.

Layne and Joe are from a different health place than my experience and I enjoyed their discussion, from which their may be some nice fermented cherries to pick.


(Running from stupidity) #22

Just listened to it (nearly finished it while walking to/from the psych today). Kahn was appalling and was continually trying to change the subject, along with just spouting his appeal to authority (“Ive done more of these than anyone, this is REAL SCIENCE”), stupidities like “KABOOM,” total BS like “I’ve been scooping cholesterol out of arteries with a spoon” - because we all know that is relevant when talking about saturated fats - and just straight up lying and avoiding issues. Kressler was hurt pretty badly when he couldn’t back up his assertion that the 2010 guidelines changed the fat recommendations, and generally sounded unconvincing while frequently struggling to name studies.

Overall, Kahn made it very difficult to keep track of what was going on, which was clearly his intention.

I thought Joe did a really good job overall (which isn’t something I always think with this podcast).

Next one tomorrow, I think.


(Rosemary Easter) #23

I agree with you about Joel Kahn and his prevaricating but at least they seemed to get equal time to talk, nothing worse than people jumping in before a point is finished.


(John) #24

Good points, he had some as well but all of his study references were meta-analysis of epidemiological studies which someone with a PhD should realize is not science.

I love the science, Dom seemed to understand it (he repeatedly had to tell Layne the study he was referencing was low carb, not keto and that they are different) and Layne seemed to think that talking loud and interrupting made up for shitty research. I am happy to listen to dissenting information but it has to be backed up.


(Chris) #25

Layne really sends a bad message which Im not sure he intends to with the whole “Pop tart IIFYM”. Shawn Baker often says “Don’t mistake youth with health”. Telling 20yr olds training hard and full of youth may not see an issue with the food quality, but its just a disaster of a message to send to the public.

Ingredients in a Frosted S’more’s Pop Tart: Enriched flour, sugar, dextrose, soybean and palm oil (with TBHQ for freshness), graham flour, high fructose corn syrup, cracker meal, corn syrup, corn syrup solids, whey, cornstarch, molasses, cocoa processes with alkali, leavening, milk chocolate, honey, natural and artificial flavors, salt, lactose, modified corn starch, soy lecithin, dried egg whites, gelatin, color added, xanthan gum, vitamin A palimitate, niacinamide, reduced iron, pyridoxine hydrochloride, thiamin hydrochloride, riboflavin, folic acid.

Dr Tro rightfully goes after this guy because of this horrendous information passed off as perfect science. Tro is a little too brash for his own good at times, but Lame hides behind his degree and is really everything that is wrong with nutritional academia


(Nicole Sawchuk) #26

I really enjoyed both podcasts because they made me think about the other side and start to understand it better. Not to say I agreed with it. I am fascinated lately about how everyone does treat nutrition almost like a religion and how we really get caught up in our beliefs! The psychology of it all is just so fascinating! Read comments from the podcasts just to get an idea of how passionate people are about it and how they can easily believe a nutrition figure and everything they say despite contrary data!

I the end, I honestly for the most part everyone is saying the same thing…eat whole foods. Figure out what works for you and no matter what you choose, it is going to involve a lot of work.

The Kahn/Kresser podcast was more annoying only because I did find Rogan to be biased and he kept interrupting Kahn so it was sometimes hard to understand his point. But nothing he said sold me that being vegan is better or that saturated fat is the devil. But the interesting part is both sides fought that their flawed data was better when it suited them.

The Dom/Layne podcast was easier to listen to and although I found Layne to be less believable, he did bring up some points that made me think and question my “beliefs”. With that said, I don’t agree with him because I tried what he said for years with a calorie deficit (carb rich) and working out like a mad woman and honestly I barely lost a couple pounds let alone be able to maintain it. I did keto on its own and could only lose 10 lbs (but got some great mood benefits and other NSV so I stuck with it). I added in fasting to keto and bam I lost 30 lbs and feel amazing and I have kept it off for over a year now! So there is something to be said about calorie restriction (thru fasting and a different pathway) and keto diet. Just applied differently.

To sum it up - I think I am now less harsh in judging other people and their diets just based on these conversations.


(Running from stupidity) #27

Didn’t finish the Kahn one, about a minute of it was more than I could cope with this morning, so I switched to the Dom/Layne one.

Layne got far too much talktime just by talking loud and fast, which Joe doesn’t really know how to deal with, so those guys always dominate, as per Kahn. It was better than the Kahn one, but not sure I learned a lot, because Layne talks a lot of science but always has an out of some (usually poor) kind when it doesn’t agree with him. As per Kahn.


(Rosemary Easter) #28

Exactly what I was saying about him - talks too loudly and fast.


#29

Finally got around to listening to this one (meal prep day!) & all in all I rather enjoyed it though I didn’t learn much that was new apart from the ‘eat cruciferous veg with your red meat’ thing. I’m definitely still in the Dom camp.


(Rosemary Easter) #30

So glad to see Tristan agrees with me.