THIS - almost anything that is based on questionnaire/associational study is almost automatically BS. If it is right, it more likely by accident than design. The key thing is that these studies can be made to say whatever the researcher wants them to say, often irrelevant to the scientific “truth” and entirely based on the bias of the author.
Remember, “lies, damned lies and statistics!”
Harvard (T H Chan Nutrition Center) makes its money and reputation on manipulating a huge survey many times a year to create click-bait that is demonstrably crap. The whole red meat is bad and bacon gives you cancer came from the same kind of sources and has been roundly debunked. It’s appalling “science”.
The much better alternative theory is that hyperinsulinemia, high blood sugars and the consequent chronic inflammation makes the neurons glucose resistant and liable to shrink until they are too far apart for signals to pass. It is more consistent to see this shrinkage in dementia/AD than amyloid bodies etc. This is nothing to do with saturated fat.
You need to push your research further rather than asking us to debunk this. If the “saturated fat is bad” garbage is real, we’d all be dropping dead of heart attacks and going mad. It doesn’t apply to CVD, and it doesn’t apply to the brain as much as the plant-based lobbies would dearly love it to be.
Or just keep up your 20g limit. It’s your WoE.