Dark Chocolate % range


(Ohio ) #1

I’m curious what everyone’s dark chocolate ranges are? Preferences? Palatability wise. Not what’s healthy or whatever. I can’t do 100% but 95% is really nice. 90-85% gets a little sugary. 80% and lower isn’t palatable to me. I’m a fan “Raaka”, “Lindt” and “Green & Blacks”

Thank you for your attention to this matter!


#2

I only liked 70% but I make my own and that is 30% or what as I don’t use cocoa butter.
But my fav is milk chocolate. I can’t make it (or it’s too complicated, I do have cocoa butter to make white chocolate and mix it with our dark one to get something like milk chocolate… but that’s for once a year? and it’s not quite like what I like) so I almost never ate it in the last 1.5 decades. No problem, it’s quite possible to live without it, I still have plenty of great desserts and eat some every day.

My own chocolate has no added sweetness as I want chocolate, not sweetness despite I do love sweet things. Just like my cocoa drink is unsweetened… And I really dislike added sugar.

My SO likes when his chocolate is about 45% cocoa powder. He uses the same amount of coconut fat as cocoa powder, I use WAY more fat (and it’s butter now as it’s about the same price
and butter is obviously superior even though a bit watery and soft so it doesn’t give me crunchy chocolate wafers). And his is sweetened a tiny bit.


(Jim Fife) #3

I love 100% chocolate with creamy cocoa butter. Sometimes I melt it in the m-w, stirr in some allulose sugar, then freeze it it. Delicious, sweet as you want it, low carb, non insulinogenic, glp1RA mimetic, etc.


(Bob M) #4

I like some of the really high percentages, but only certain ones. Taza 85% for instance. It’ s ridiculously expensive, though.

After that, I have a hard time eating greater than 70%.

I do use 100% to make things (like “mousse”), but I find I have to add a lot of allulose to make it palatable.

This may be because I think I have an issue with the higher percentages, as I THINK they can make me wake up at night. There does seem to be a pattern, but I can’t 100% prove it.

Where I live, chocolate prices have skyrocketed. The “bar” prices are easily $1+ more than they used to be. Went to look at chocolate for Mother’s Day, and the bars were $7 each. Yikes.


#5

That’s a smallish change then…? Cocoa powder price almost doubled here not so very long ago (I am bad with time, maybe last year?)… So our homemade chocolate is significantly more expensive now. Oh well. It’s a staple for my SO who can’t give up little joys, his life is hard enough.


(Tracie Angel) #6

You have an impressive palate! Most people tap out long before 95%. I totally get what you mean about the 80s starting to taste a bit too sugary once your tastebuds adjust to the dark stuff. Lindt 90% is a staple in my house, but Raaka is such a great choice for that unique, unroasted flavor. It’s awesome that 95% is your sweet spot!


(Ohio ) #7

Sometimes I find 95% comes across bitter; I’m often eating it w/ walnuts. So it’s diluted. But I have pounds of Lindt 95 in my stockpile. Raaka 90% is really impressive & really expensive. But Organic and probably the best out there.


(Sally Walters) #8

I like 95% also. I started with 72%, and gradually made my way up to 95%. Without sugar or artificial sweeteners (I can’t stand them, they leave a weird aftertaste for me), my taste buds have become much more sensitive. The 95% actually tastes sweet most of the time. I have moved to mostly carnivore and have stopped eating chocolate for now…