If you are having your daily carbs is there a certain time of the day that is better?
Carb timing
we are less insulin responsive earlier in the day, but really donāt think it matters. good whole food healthy carbs eat them any time
I imagine itās better to eat the bulk of our carbs when weāre eating plenty of fat so that our reaction to them might be buffered by the slower digestion of the fats, rather than having carbs in isolation. But thatās just āmom science,ā so donāt take it as fact.
Iāve seen reports that we are more insulin sensitive in the morning, and less in the evening:
Regardless of the time the carbs are eaten, Iād think itās better to do them all at once, rather than spaced out over time, making for more periods of insulin secretion.
I based mine on Dr. Fung. and think it is based on the insulin spike we get at sun rise even without eating
but I will go back and find that info in case i was reading it wrong. but if you think our bodies are smart then carbs a night when we are shutting down should have a greater response.
Daily carbs are supposed to be incidental and under 20 grams. I do not think it matters when you have them as that is such a small amount from, presumably, from a whole food source.
I would assume if you were having much larger amounts of carbs at a particular time that it would be best to have them a few hours before some heavy exercise so that you quickly burn off the resulting glucose and get back into ketosis quickly (please let me emphasize āassumeā - not a doctor).
Might be in reference to the ādawn phenomenonā where blood sugar rises in anticipation of daily activites, not an insulin spike, per se.
Are our bodies smart? Well, yes - in general, very smart, and the human organism is an incredibly tough one. Still, past a point our hormonal responses get diluted in effect, and our bodies doing what they think is the right thing to do can have bad consequences. Iām still a maniac, but for 45+ years I was a more constant and crazier maniac, and here I amā¦
hmm I do cyclical keto for lifting reasons with weekends loading up on pure glycogen carbs like maltodextrin and sweet potatoes and keeping fats at max 20 gramsā¦ik ik it sounds crazy but doing that from friday to sunday and staying keto monday through friday at 10 grams of net carbs and 140 fats is really effective!!! This form of eating allowed my cholest too drop dramitcally from self testing I did on the sundayā¦Considering I ate nothing but bacon meat and eggs with plenty of veggies through out the week!
Do you actually stay in ketosis with this eating schedule?
(If not, itād be more accurate to say that you do cyclical LCHF.)
Yeah Kevin, from friday to sunday I do 200< net carb >250 protein <20 fat
along with a 16 hour fast till monday afternoon after fasted weight training.
I test positive on strips every monday through friday.
along with the fact I weigh 140 and now am at 10% bodyfat FYI , Height: 5.5 feet
It sounds like you might be so fat adapted that you can easily switch - I think thatās supposed to be a good thing.
I wonder what would happen though if you kept the same eating pattern but did no lifting for a week.
Whether it is true switching of fuel sources or whether your exercise is simply burning away all of your glycogen before the brain has a chance to get addicted to it again.
Thatās impressive. Iām guessing that the 16 hour fast (with fasted weight training) helps you to get back in ketosis after consuming carbs over the weekend.
yes sir kevin but note that I am not lifting a 10lb dumbell for a few minā¦infact I am grinding at the RDLS,stairmaster, and chest press for 2 hours running only on the carbs I ate over the weekend and some matcha green tea with a splash of almond milk (like 1 tbsp or 2)
Oh, I believe it! I think itād be hard to burn off enough of your glycogen reserves with just a 16 hour fast combined with light/minimal exercise.
Well, the answer lies in the circadian rhythm, which Iāve written about previously. Recall that insulin, not total calories is the main driver of obesity, although there is an overlap, to be sure. Different foods elicit different insulin responses, and therefore have different propensities to cause obesity. That is, 100 calories of cookies are more fattening than 100 calories of broccoli, despite what all the mindless calorie zombies tell you.
The same food will also elicit different insulin responses at different times of the day. Eating the same food at dinner (compared to breakfast) gives you almost 30% more insulin effect. In other words, food is more fattening when you eat it later at night. But the bad news for late eaters does not stop there. If you look at the circadian rhythm for hunger, youāll find that hunger is lowest in the morning and greatest in the evening 8:00 pm or so.
Another study (Bo, S et al) found the same phenomenon. In this crossover study, they took 20 healthy people, gave them the same meal but either in the morning or evening. So both arms had exactly the same people, eating the exact same meal, but only differing by time of day. The evening meal stimulated significantly higher blood glucose and blood insulin response and insulin is the main driver of obesity. Even more interesting, the evening meal produced a much lower resting energy expenditure afterwards compared to the morning meal.
So, if you eat your largest meal in the evening, you suffer from 3 problems. Youāll be more likely to eat more (because you are more hungry ā yikes), youāll get more fattening effect for the food that you do eat (higher insulin ā double yikes), and youāll have lower energy expenditure (more calories will get turned to fat). TRIPLE YIKES!
Nice post, Alley. Itās a good point to think of things in terms of insulin, rather than calories, or at least to take them both into account.
I used to scoff at the idea that āeating late in the dayā was worse for us, but yes - if we plot insulin levels over time, the āarea under the curveā will be greater late in the day. Some ābad magicā right there. Iāve always been a āevening personā versus a morning person, too. 