Okay, I know it is quite a bad question in more than one sense, but I try to phrase it.
Let’s say a certain person can only have below 30gram of carb to be in ketosis.
So, for him, 40gram of net carb intake, 100gram of net carb intake and 400gram of net carb intake won’t make a significant difference, where 20gram of net carb intake will enable him to be in ketosis.
- Is this understanding correct?
The reason why I asked like that is because as much as I can give up all the obvious carbs(rice/noodles/biscuit/sugary drink), I am not sure if I can bear the food without the sauce that is nice but carby, so those sauce already added in the carb intake. Let’s consider the fact that the vegetable and the fruits have the carb as well.
Erm… The carb intake is, of course, still quite low(less than 100g), but it is quite more or less confirmed that I won’t be in ketosis, as the carb intake is not that low, thus I am then unable to force to use fat/ketone as energy, then I cannot burn fat… Then it is also quite annoying. As in, giving up obvious carb is good health, but that’s all: no fat will be burnt, and no weight will then be lost for good… <_<