I wouldn’t call it spam, but rather trolling. The admin staff will keep an eye on the account and determine how to proceed.
@richard has expressed a preference for not censoring inaccurate information, but instead countering it with good information. What he calls a “teachable moment.” So anyone who’d care to inundate the OP with decent study data, have at it!
You are probably right. Thanks to you and @amwassil for tracking down the sources of the OP’s two threads, so far. The Health.com article that led off this thread is so easily demolished that I wonder they were not ashamed to post it in the first place.
Let’s see what further wacky information comes from this profile.