John, I like those two as well. The more ‘magic’ we see in #1, the less we’d need the others, i.e. if I could be the supreme medical researcher and eliminate mortality for pets, then 6 is out.
There were a lot of different picks on a Facebook discussion, Paul. 6 for pet owners/lovers is a big one - though many people mentioned that it would need to not only be that the pet would live longer, period, but that they’d have to be healthy/like they were when “they were young.” 9 would indeed be nice, and 1 could negate some of the others or strongly affect them. I wonder what we would all do with #2.
Omar, I ended up taking 1, 6 and 9. I was hesitant with 1 - the learning and “doing” part of gaining a skill is a big part of life, and I wonder about the difference if we are just granted skills.
Yes - a Monkey’s Paw scenario could wreck things. I take it that the consequences of each would be benign, i.e. pets would live longer, not us dying sooner, and that #1 would be somewhat limited, i.e. not much ‘magic’ in it.