Hello all!
A question, which has been on my mind, pertains to “normal blood sugars” vs “normal A1c”
For example- Say my A1c currently runs 5.7 on a low carb diet without exercising; and if I am very disciplined (working out and eating perfect) I can get it down to 5.3.
I am assuming that if I go to a doctor, asking to be treated for diabetes- they will say that I am doing fine and not to worry. I have heard some say that a normal blood sugar is 83 and normal A1c around 4.4. So- Say that I would like to do the best I can and say I buy into striving for “normal blood sugars” or an A1c of 4.4 - I am going to need some help (meds or insulin).
I am still trying to understand “diabetes”. When I check my blood sugars- I don’t see large increases after meals (maybe a little over 100) (because I don’t really eat any carbs. I actually often see blood sugars in the 70’s when I get home from work, bc I skip lunch to stick with two meals a day. Unfortunately, my morning blood sugars are often 90-100 range (suspected dawn phenomenom).
My initial impression is that even though these are not “wild swings” in blood sugars- perhaps I could/should minimize these swings even more. Following this line of thinking- perhaps small dose of insulin before my breakfast and dinner; and/or some in the evening to counter my dawn phenomenom may balance out my blood sugar (make it more uniformly stable).
I have been shooting for a “good A1c” but i’m now thinking it may not be the best approach to achieve it by having somewhat lower blood sugars half the time; in order to compensate for the inevitable blood sugar rises after eating and that are due to dawn phenomenom.
Sorry to be long-winded. I appreciate any thoughts or input.
Thanks!