I also saw yesterday an article that came out the day before the coconut oil one where the AHA is recommending people eat margarine instead of butter because of the sat fat. Way to go AHA. Seems like a bunch of uninformed morons running the show there.
NEWS! (Not Really) - AHA hates coconut oil
I just saw the article and posted it. I apologize for the repeat post. My good friend used to work the AHA as a receptionist. She told me never to donate money to them because the majority of the money donated goes to thank you gifts for people who come to the fund raising parties. A very small percentage actually goes to science or, like helping people. What a crock.
Is this article in response to all the attention keto has been getting, do you think?
OK, I had to read Taubesâ article just to see how Bing Crosby fits into to it.
âBing Crosby epidemiologyâ â i.e., âaccentuate the positive and eliminate the negative.â In short, itâs cherry picking, and itâs how a lawyer builds an argument but not how a scientist works to establish reliable knowledge"
and a bit further downâŚ
They are literally saying (not figuratively, literally) that vegetable oils â soy, canola, etc â are as beneficial as statins and so we should all consume them.
Which, may be true if you subscribe to the theory that statins are worse than nothing for most people.
Are you kidding me?! This is freaking going backwards! WTF!
http://amp.usatoday.com/story/402719001
[merged topic - CarolT]
Pro Tip: Whenever you see advice from an institution whose name begins with âAmericanâ and ends with âAssociationâ ⌠buckle up.
Itâs like coffee. One minute itâs poison and another it is curing cancer and prolonging your life!
Could this have possibly triggered the anti coconut oil crap? https://www.cropscience.bayer.us/news/press-releases/2017/03022017-bayer-and-libertylink-soybeans-help-protect-hearts-in-americas-heartland?xtmc=Aha&xtnp=1&xtcr=1
Thatâs the thing, thereâs no new science â they just keep recycling and repackaging the same old ideas and releasing it as a new âstudyâ. When you find out who is funding this crap, you understand that itâs literally nothing more than marketing.
Simply put, they are starting and finishing with a false premise: higher LDL means you have heart disease. They donât look at actual outcomes (was there any actual harm), they just jump to the conclusion (called a surrogate endpoint). Mostly because they are supported by the pharmaceutical industry, which is making billions selling statin drugs which only do one thing: lower LDL.
From the Bayer PR I noticed this line
Allen Gent, Strategic Business Lead for Bayer, said, âThe average age of the American farmer is well over 50 years old, and automation is much more prevelant in todayâs agriculture climate. Growers are more sendentary than in the past, which is one contributing factor to cardiovascular disease
Could it be that they are eating the crap that they grow ??
Yeah, this seems to be trending at the moment.
The video I watched yesterday had my jaw agape the entire time - they opened by saying âCoconut oil isnât good for you, itâs fat!â. And it was downhill from there.
I find it very dishonest when they donât actually link to the report. We get to make a really splashy headline without justification!
The day before that article came out, I read one saying Butter was bad and we should be using margarine insteadâŚ
That Channel 10 webpage just looks like click-bait advertising to me. The thesis is that saturated fat âis bad for you,â and at the very least there is more to the truth than that.
âA new report by the American Heart Association says coconut oil is as bad for the body as other oils high in saturated fat, like butter, beef fat and palm oil.â â On that webpage, the âAmerican Heart Associationâ is a link, and if you click on it you go to another page where the very first article mentioned is âControversial paper says saturated fats donât clog arteries.â
SheeshâŚ
Technically that statement is correct, in that theyâre not at all bad for youâŚ